Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Cost Estimators Salary: Evansville, IN vs Pittsfield, MA

Cost Estimators earn a median of $70,010 in Evansville, IN and $97,000 in Pittsfield, MA. That is a nominal gap of $26,990 (-27.8%), with Pittsfield, MA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$70,010
Evansville, IN median
$76,490 after COL
$97,000
Pittsfield, MA median
$101,991 after COL
-27.8%
Nominal gap
Pittsfield, MA leads
-25.0%
Adjusted gap
Pittsfield, MA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Pittsfield, MA pays $26,990 more per year than Evansville, IN for cost estimators, a gap of +27.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Pittsfield, MA still comes out ahead, with roughly $25,501 of extra purchasing power (+25.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cost estimators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cost Estimators

Evansville, IN

Median salary
$70,010
Mean salary
$73,780
Employment
200
Location quotient
1.05
Jobs per 1,000
1.5
COL-adjusted median
$76,490
Regional Price Parity
91.5%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Cost Estimators page for Evansville, IN →

Cost Estimators

Pittsfield, MA

Median salary
$97,000
Mean salary
$99,780
Employment
110
Location quotient
1.37
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$101,991
Regional Price Parity
95.1%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Cost Estimators page for Pittsfield, MA →

Related pages

Keep digging into cost estimators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.