Skip to content
uswages .org

Costume Attendants Salary: Nevada vs Hawaii

Costume Attendants earn a median of $55,640 in Nevada and $57,660 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $2,020 (-3.5%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$55,640
Nevada median
$55,652 after COL
$57,660
Hawaii median
$52,442 after COL
-3.5%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
+6.1%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $2,020 more per year than Nevada for costume attendants, a gap of +3.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nevada actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,210 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for costume attendants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Costume Attendants

Nevada

Median salary
$55,640
Mean salary
$59,450
Employment
390
Location quotient
6.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$55,652
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Costume Attendants page for Nevada →

Costume Attendants

Hawaii

Median salary
$57,660
Mean salary
$54,740
Employment
30
Location quotient
1.22
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$52,442
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Costume Attendants page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into costume attendants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.