Skip to content
uswages .org

Counter And Rental Clerks Salary: Rhode Island vs Vermont

Counter And Rental Clerks earn a median of $46,360 in Rhode Island and $48,430 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $2,070 (-4.3%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,360
Rhode Island median
$45,327 after COL
$48,430
Vermont median
$49,440 after COL
-4.3%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-8.3%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $2,070 more per year than Rhode Island for counter and rental clerks, a gap of +4.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,113 of extra purchasing power (+8.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for counter and rental clerks in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Counter And Rental Clerks

Rhode Island

Median salary
$46,360
Mean salary
$48,440
Employment
840
Location quotient
0.65
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$45,327
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Counter And Rental Clerks page for Rhode Island →

Counter And Rental Clerks

Vermont

Median salary
$48,430
Mean salary
$51,950
Employment
750
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
2.5
COL-adjusted median
$49,440
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Counter And Rental Clerks page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into counter and rental clerks from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.