Skip to content
uswages .org

Crane And Tower Operators Salary: Massachusetts vs Rhode Island

Crane And Tower Operators earn a median of $98,150 in Massachusetts and $104,340 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $6,190 (-5.9%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$98,150
Massachusetts median
$92,807 after COL
$104,340
Rhode Island median
$102,014 after COL
-5.9%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
-9.0%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $6,190 more per year than Massachusetts for crane and tower operators, a gap of +5.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,207 of extra purchasing power (+9.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for crane and tower operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Crane And Tower Operators

Massachusetts

Median salary
$98,150
Mean salary
$100,260
Employment
680
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$92,807
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Crane And Tower Operators page for Massachusetts →

Crane And Tower Operators

Rhode Island

Median salary
$104,340
Mean salary
$99,690
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$102,014
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Crane And Tower Operators page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into crane and tower operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.