Skip to content
uswages .org

Credit Counselors Salary: Washington vs California

Credit Counselors earn a median of $62,360 in Washington and $67,120 in California. That is a nominal gap of $4,760 (-7.1%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$62,360
Washington median
$58,273 after COL
$67,120
California median
$60,621 after COL
-7.1%
Nominal gap
California leads
-3.9%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $4,760 more per year than Washington for credit counselors, a gap of +7.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,348 of extra purchasing power (+3.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for credit counselors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Credit Counselors

Washington

Median salary
$62,360
Mean salary
$65,530
Employment
560
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$58,273
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Credit Counselors page for Washington →

Credit Counselors

California

Median salary
$67,120
Mean salary
$71,180
Employment
2,160
Location quotient
0.66
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$60,621
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Credit Counselors page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into credit counselors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.