Skip to content
uswages .org

Crossing Guards And Flaggers Salary: North Dakota vs Oregon

Crossing Guards And Flaggers earn a median of $60,230 in North Dakota and $47,110 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $13,120 (+27.8%), with North Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,230
North Dakota median
$67,705 after COL
$47,110
Oregon median
$45,578 after COL
+27.8%
Nominal gap
North Dakota leads
+48.5%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Dakota pays $13,120 more per year than Oregon for crossing guards and flaggers, a gap of +27.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $22,127 of extra purchasing power (+48.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for crossing guards and flaggers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Crossing Guards And Flaggers

North Dakota

Median salary
$60,230
Mean salary
$56,790
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$67,705
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Crossing Guards And Flaggers page for North Dakota →

Crossing Guards And Flaggers

Oregon

Median salary
$47,110
Mean salary
$53,610
Employment
2,250
Location quotient
1.89
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$45,578
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Crossing Guards And Flaggers page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into crossing guards and flaggers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.