Skip to content
uswages .org

Curators Salary: Rhode Island vs California

Curators earn a median of $77,930 in Rhode Island and $78,740 in California. That is a nominal gap of $810 (-1.0%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$77,930
Rhode Island median
$76,193 after COL
$78,740
California median
$71,116 after COL
-1.0%
Nominal gap
California leads
+7.1%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $810 more per year than Rhode Island for curators, a gap of +1.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Rhode Island actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $5,076 more in national-price-level terms (a +7.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for curators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Curators

Rhode Island

Median salary
$77,930
Mean salary
$82,470
Employment
70
Location quotient
1.87
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$76,193
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Curators page for Rhode Island →

Curators

California

Median salary
$78,740
Mean salary
$86,330
Employment
1,140
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$71,116
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Curators page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into curators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.