Skip to content
uswages .org

Customer Service Representatives Salary: Victoria, TX vs Napa, CA

Customer Service Representatives earn a median of $37,440 in Victoria, TX and $53,360 in Napa, CA. That is a nominal gap of $15,920 (-29.8%), with Napa, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$37,440
Victoria, TX median
$41,675 after COL
$53,360
Napa, CA median
$47,408 after COL
-29.8%
Nominal gap
Napa, CA leads
-12.1%
Adjusted gap
Napa, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Napa, CA pays $15,920 more per year than Victoria, TX for customer service representatives, a gap of +29.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Napa, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,734 of extra purchasing power (+12.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for customer service representatives in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Customer Service Representatives

Victoria, TX

Median salary
$37,440
Mean salary
$37,780
Employment
570
Location quotient
0.89
Jobs per 1,000
14.9
COL-adjusted median
$41,675
Regional Price Parity
89.8%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Customer Service Representatives page for Victoria, TX →

Customer Service Representatives

Napa, CA

Median salary
$53,360
Mean salary
$55,930
Employment
640
Location quotient
0.49
Jobs per 1,000
8.2
COL-adjusted median
$47,408
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Customer Service Representatives page for Napa, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into customer service representatives from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.