Skip to content
uswages .org

Cutters And Trimmers, Hand Salary: Vermont vs Rhode Island

Cutters And Trimmers, Hand earn a median of $48,670 in Vermont and $48,100 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $570 (+1.2%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,670
Vermont median
$49,685 after COL
$48,100
Rhode Island median
$47,028 after COL
+1.2%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
+5.6%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $570 more per year than Rhode Island for cutters and trimmers, hand, a gap of +1.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,657 of extra purchasing power (+5.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cutters and trimmers, hand in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cutters And Trimmers, Hand

Vermont

Median salary
$48,670
Mean salary
$53,050
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$49,685
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cutters And Trimmers, Hand page for Vermont →

Cutters And Trimmers, Hand

Rhode Island

Median salary
$48,100
Mean salary
$44,740
Employment
50
Location quotient
2.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$47,028
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cutters And Trimmers, Hand page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into cutters and trimmers, hand from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.