Skip to content
uswages .org

Database Architects Salary: California vs Massachusetts

Database Architects earn a median of $170,160 in California and $161,650 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $8,510 (+5.3%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$170,160
California median
$153,685 after COL
$161,650
Massachusetts median
$152,850 after COL
+5.3%
Nominal gap
California leads
+0.5%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $8,510 more per year than Massachusetts for database architects, a gap of +5.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $835 of extra purchasing power (+0.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for database architects in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Database Architects

California

Median salary
$170,160
Mean salary
$175,330
Employment
6,210
Location quotient
0.79
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$153,685
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Database Architects page for California →

Database Architects

Massachusetts

Median salary
$161,650
Mean salary
$163,290
Employment
2,690
Location quotient
1.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$152,850
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Database Architects page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into database architects from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.