Skip to content
uswages .org

Dental Hygienists Salary: Napa, CA vs Anchorage, AK

Dental Hygienists earn a median of $131,370 in Napa, CA and $132,740 in Anchorage, AK. That is a nominal gap of $1,370 (-1.0%), with Anchorage, AK paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$131,370
Napa, CA median
$116,717 after COL
$132,740
Anchorage, AK median
$125,915 after COL
-1.0%
Nominal gap
Anchorage, AK leads
-7.3%
Adjusted gap
Anchorage, AK leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Anchorage, AK pays $1,370 more per year than Napa, CA for dental hygienists, a gap of +1.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Anchorage, AK still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,198 of extra purchasing power (+7.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for dental hygienists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Dental Hygienists

Napa, CA

Median salary
$131,370
Mean salary
$131,610
Employment
100
Location quotient
0.94
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$116,717
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Dental Hygienists page for Napa, CA →

Dental Hygienists

Anchorage, AK

Median salary
$132,740
Mean salary
$120,670
Employment
490
Location quotient
1.93
Jobs per 1,000
2.8
COL-adjusted median
$125,915
Regional Price Parity
105.4%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Dental Hygienists page for Anchorage, AK →

Related pages

Keep digging into dental hygienists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.