Skip to content
uswages .org

Dermatologists Salary: Arkansas vs Wisconsin

Dermatologists earn a median of $422,060 in Arkansas and $440,710 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $18,650 (-4.2%), with Wisconsin paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$422,060
Arkansas median
$485,478 after COL
$440,710
Wisconsin median
$468,367 after COL
-4.2%
Nominal gap
Wisconsin leads
+3.7%
Adjusted gap
Arkansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wisconsin pays $18,650 more per year than Arkansas for dermatologists, a gap of +4.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Arkansas actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $17,111 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for dermatologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Dermatologists

Arkansas

Median salary
$422,060
Mean salary
$378,500
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.45
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$485,478
Regional Price Parity
86.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dermatologists page for Arkansas →

Dermatologists

Wisconsin

Median salary
$440,710
Mean salary
$459,550
Employment
160
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$468,367
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dermatologists page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into dermatologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.