Skip to content
uswages .org

Designers, All Other Salary: New Hampshire vs Pennsylvania

Designers, All Other earn a median of $94,660 in New Hampshire and $72,760 in Pennsylvania. That is a nominal gap of $21,900 (+30.1%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$94,660
New Hampshire median
$90,875 after COL
$72,760
Pennsylvania median
$74,571 after COL
+30.1%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
+21.9%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $21,900 more per year than Pennsylvania for designers, all other, a gap of +30.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,304 of extra purchasing power (+21.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for designers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Designers, All Other

New Hampshire

Median salary
$94,660
Mean salary
$73,870
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$90,875
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Designers, All Other page for New Hampshire →

Designers, All Other

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$72,760
Mean salary
$75,990
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$74,571
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Designers, All Other page for Pennsylvania →

Related pages

Keep digging into designers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.