Skip to content
uswages .org

Diagnostic Medical Sonographers Salary: Alaska vs Washington

Diagnostic Medical Sonographers earn a median of $105,670 in Alaska and $121,340 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $15,670 (-12.9%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$105,670
Alaska median
$103,235 after COL
$121,340
Washington median
$113,388 after COL
-12.9%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-9.0%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $15,670 more per year than Alaska for diagnostic medical sonographers, a gap of +12.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,153 of extra purchasing power (+9.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for diagnostic medical sonographers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Diagnostic Medical Sonographers

Alaska

Median salary
$105,670
Mean salary
$106,180
Employment
140
Location quotient
0.77
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$103,235
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Diagnostic Medical Sonographers page for Alaska →

Diagnostic Medical Sonographers

Washington

Median salary
$121,340
Mean salary
$115,060
Employment
2,190
Location quotient
1.06
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$113,388
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Diagnostic Medical Sonographers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into diagnostic medical sonographers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.