Skip to content
uswages .org

Dietitians And Nutritionists Salary: Alaska vs Washington

Dietitians And Nutritionists earn a median of $87,980 in Alaska and $84,220 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $3,760 (+4.5%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$87,980
Alaska median
$85,952 after COL
$84,220
Washington median
$78,701 after COL
+4.5%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
+9.2%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $3,760 more per year than Washington for dietitians and nutritionists, a gap of +4.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,252 of extra purchasing power (+9.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for dietitians and nutritionists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Dietitians And Nutritionists

Alaska

Median salary
$87,980
Mean salary
$87,810
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$85,952
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietitians And Nutritionists page for Alaska →

Dietitians And Nutritionists

Washington

Median salary
$84,220
Mean salary
$85,170
Employment
1,450
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$78,701
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietitians And Nutritionists page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into dietitians and nutritionists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.