Skip to content
uswages .org

Dietitians And Nutritionists Salary: California vs Oregon

Dietitians And Nutritionists earn a median of $98,850 in California and $84,180 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $14,670 (+17.4%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$98,850
California median
$89,279 after COL
$84,180
Oregon median
$81,443 after COL
+17.4%
Nominal gap
California leads
+9.6%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $14,670 more per year than Oregon for dietitians and nutritionists, a gap of +17.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,837 of extra purchasing power (+9.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for dietitians and nutritionists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Dietitians And Nutritionists

California

Median salary
$98,850
Mean salary
$98,780
Employment
8,720
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$89,279
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietitians And Nutritionists page for California →

Dietitians And Nutritionists

Oregon

Median salary
$84,180
Mean salary
$86,210
Employment
700
Location quotient
0.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$81,443
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietitians And Nutritionists page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into dietitians and nutritionists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.