Skip to content
uswages .org

Dietitians And Nutritionists Salary: California vs West Virginia

Dietitians And Nutritionists earn a median of $98,850 in California and $89,440 in West Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $9,410 (+10.5%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$98,850
California median
$89,279 after COL
$89,440
West Virginia median
$99,936 after COL
+10.5%
Nominal gap
California leads
-10.7%
Adjusted gap
West Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $9,410 more per year than West Virginia for dietitians and nutritionists, a gap of +10.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. West Virginia actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $10,657 more in national-price-level terms (a +10.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for dietitians and nutritionists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Dietitians And Nutritionists

California

Median salary
$98,850
Mean salary
$98,780
Employment
8,720
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$89,279
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietitians And Nutritionists page for California →

Dietitians And Nutritionists

West Virginia

Median salary
$89,440
Mean salary
$81,860
Employment
520
Location quotient
1.47
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$99,936
Regional Price Parity
89.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietitians And Nutritionists page for West Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into dietitians and nutritionists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.