Skip to content
uswages .org

Economics Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Oregon vs Connecticut

Economics Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $136,450 in Oregon and $155,950 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $19,500 (-12.5%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$136,450
Oregon median
$132,013 after COL
$155,950
Connecticut median
$150,516 after COL
-12.5%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-12.3%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $19,500 more per year than Oregon for economics teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +12.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,503 of extra purchasing power (+12.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for economics teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Economics Teachers, Postsecondary

Oregon

Median salary
$136,450
Mean salary
$139,940
Employment
180
Location quotient
1.24
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$132,013
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Economics Teachers, Postsecondary page for Oregon →

Economics Teachers, Postsecondary

Connecticut

Median salary
$155,950
Mean salary
$180,860
Employment
300
Location quotient
2.37
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$150,516
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Economics Teachers, Postsecondary page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into economics teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.