Skip to content
uswages .org

Economists Salary: North Carolina vs Virginia

Economists earn a median of $136,150 in North Carolina and $137,590 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $1,440 (-1.0%), with Virginia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$136,150
North Carolina median
$144,340 after COL
$137,590
Virginia median
$136,088 after COL
-1.0%
Nominal gap
Virginia leads
+6.1%
Adjusted gap
North Carolina leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Virginia pays $1,440 more per year than North Carolina for economists, a gap of +1.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. North Carolina actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $8,252 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for economists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Economists

North Carolina

Median salary
$136,150
Mean salary
$136,220
Employment
290
Location quotient
0.52
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$144,340
Regional Price Parity
94.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Economists page for North Carolina →

Economists

Virginia

Median salary
$137,590
Mean salary
$144,880
Employment
950
Location quotient
2.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$136,088
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Economists page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into economists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.