Skip to content
uswages .org

Editors Salary: District of Columbia vs Virginia

Editors earn a median of $83,920 in District of Columbia and $80,590 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $3,330 (+4.1%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$83,920
District of Columbia median
$76,360 after COL
$80,590
Virginia median
$79,710 after COL
+4.1%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-4.2%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $3,330 more per year than Virginia for editors, a gap of +4.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Virginia actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,350 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.2% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for editors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Editors

District of Columbia

Median salary
$83,920
Mean salary
$109,290
Employment
3,310
Location quotient
7.99
Jobs per 1,000
4.7
COL-adjusted median
$76,360
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Editors page for District of Columbia →

Editors

Virginia

Median salary
$80,590
Mean salary
$89,740
Employment
2,720
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$79,710
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Editors page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into editors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.