Skip to content
uswages .org

Emergency Medical Technicians Salary: Oregon vs Washington

Emergency Medical Technicians earn a median of $49,270 in Oregon and $52,690 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $3,420 (-6.5%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,270
Oregon median
$47,668 after COL
$52,690
Washington median
$49,237 after COL
-6.5%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-3.2%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $3,420 more per year than Oregon for emergency medical technicians, a gap of +6.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,569 of extra purchasing power (+3.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for emergency medical technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Emergency Medical Technicians

Oregon

Median salary
$49,270
Mean salary
$50,040
Employment
1,970
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$47,668
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Emergency Medical Technicians page for Oregon →

Emergency Medical Technicians

Washington

Median salary
$52,690
Mean salary
$52,000
Employment
2,940
Location quotient
0.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$49,237
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Emergency Medical Technicians page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into emergency medical technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.