Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Epidemiologists Salary: Texas vs Minnesota

Epidemiologists earn a median of $76,420 in Texas and $99,360 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $22,940 (-23.1%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$76,420
Texas median
$78,737 after COL
$99,360
Minnesota median
$100,749 after COL
-23.1%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-21.8%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $22,940 more per year than Texas for epidemiologists, a gap of +23.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $22,012 of extra purchasing power (+21.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for epidemiologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Epidemiologists

Texas

Median salary
$76,420
Mean salary
$96,120
Employment
940
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$78,737
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Epidemiologists page for Texas →

Epidemiologists

Minnesota

Median salary
$99,360
Mean salary
$98,110
Employment
260
Location quotient
1.21
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$100,749
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Epidemiologists page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into epidemiologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.