Skip to content
uswages .org

Etchers And Engravers Salary: Massachusetts vs Arizona

Etchers And Engravers earn a median of $50,710 in Massachusetts and $59,940 in Arizona. That is a nominal gap of $9,230 (-15.4%), with Arizona paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$50,710
Massachusetts median
$47,950 after COL
$59,940
Arizona median
$59,537 after COL
-15.4%
Nominal gap
Arizona leads
-19.5%
Adjusted gap
Arizona leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Arizona pays $9,230 more per year than Massachusetts for etchers and engravers, a gap of +15.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Arizona still comes out ahead, with roughly $11,587 of extra purchasing power (+19.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for etchers and engravers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Etchers And Engravers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$50,710
Mean salary
$51,600
Employment
320
Location quotient
1.77
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$47,950
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Etchers And Engravers page for Massachusetts →

Etchers And Engravers

Arizona

Median salary
$59,940
Mean salary
$54,620
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$59,537
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Etchers And Engravers page for Arizona →

Related pages

Keep digging into etchers and engravers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.