Skip to content
uswages .org

Extraction Workers, All Other Salary: West Virginia vs Nevada

Extraction Workers, All Other earn a median of $63,550 in West Virginia and $67,450 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $3,900 (-5.8%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$63,550
West Virginia median
$71,008 after COL
$67,450
Nevada median
$67,464 after COL
-5.8%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
+5.3%
Adjusted gap
West Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $3,900 more per year than West Virginia for extraction workers, all other, a gap of +5.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. West Virginia actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,544 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for extraction workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Extraction Workers, All Other

West Virginia

Median salary
$63,550
Mean salary
$64,570
Employment
470
Location quotient
18.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$71,008
Regional Price Parity
89.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Extraction Workers, All Other page for West Virginia →

Extraction Workers, All Other

Nevada

Median salary
$67,450
Mean salary
$71,080
Employment
390
Location quotient
7.03
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$67,464
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Extraction Workers, All Other page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into extraction workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.