Skip to content
uswages .org

Extraction Workers, All Other Salary: West Virginia vs Texas

Extraction Workers, All Other earn a median of $63,550 in West Virginia and $61,290 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $2,260 (+3.7%), with West Virginia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$63,550
West Virginia median
$71,008 after COL
$61,290
Texas median
$63,148 after COL
+3.7%
Nominal gap
West Virginia leads
+12.4%
Adjusted gap
West Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, West Virginia pays $2,260 more per year than Texas for extraction workers, all other, a gap of +3.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, West Virginia still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,860 of extra purchasing power (+12.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for extraction workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Extraction Workers, All Other

West Virginia

Median salary
$63,550
Mean salary
$64,570
Employment
470
Location quotient
18.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$71,008
Regional Price Parity
89.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Extraction Workers, All Other page for West Virginia →

Extraction Workers, All Other

Texas

Median salary
$61,290
Mean salary
$54,790
Employment
1,070
Location quotient
2.14
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$63,148
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Extraction Workers, All Other page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into extraction workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.