Skip to content
uswages .org

Fabric And Apparel Patternmakers Salary: Oregon vs Indiana

Fabric And Apparel Patternmakers earn a median of $55,740 in Oregon and $59,400 in Indiana. That is a nominal gap of $3,660 (-6.2%), with Indiana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$55,740
Oregon median
$53,927 after COL
$59,400
Indiana median
$63,646 after COL
-6.2%
Nominal gap
Indiana leads
-15.3%
Adjusted gap
Indiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Indiana pays $3,660 more per year than Oregon for fabric and apparel patternmakers, a gap of +6.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Indiana still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,718 of extra purchasing power (+15.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fabric and apparel patternmakers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fabric And Apparel Patternmakers

Oregon

Median salary
$55,740
Mean salary
$57,290
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.85
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$53,927
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fabric And Apparel Patternmakers page for Oregon →

Fabric And Apparel Patternmakers

Indiana

Median salary
$59,400
Mean salary
$61,640
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.77
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$63,646
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fabric And Apparel Patternmakers page for Indiana →

Related pages

Keep digging into fabric and apparel patternmakers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.