Skip to content
uswages .org

Family Medicine Physicians Salary: Oregon vs Alaska

Family Medicine Physicians earn a median of $293,240 in Oregon and $323,490 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $30,250 (-9.4%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$293,240
Oregon median
$283,705 after COL
$323,490
Alaska median
$316,035 after COL
-9.4%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-10.2%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $30,250 more per year than Oregon for family medicine physicians, a gap of +9.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $32,330 of extra purchasing power (+10.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for family medicine physicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Family Medicine Physicians

Oregon

Median salary
$293,240
Mean salary
$275,320
Employment
1,490
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$283,705
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Family Medicine Physicians page for Oregon →

Family Medicine Physicians

Alaska

Median salary
$323,490
Mean salary
$307,210
Employment
760
Location quotient
3.40
Jobs per 1,000
2.3
COL-adjusted median
$316,035
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Family Medicine Physicians page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into family medicine physicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.