Skip to content
uswages .org

Fashion Designers Salary: New York vs Virginia

Fashion Designers earn a median of $98,640 in New York and $94,120 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $4,520 (+4.8%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$98,640
New York median
$91,400 after COL
$94,120
Virginia median
$93,092 after COL
+4.8%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-1.8%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $4,520 more per year than Virginia for fashion designers, a gap of +4.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Virginia actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,692 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fashion designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fashion Designers

New York

Median salary
$98,640
Mean salary
$111,740
Employment
5,760
Location quotient
4.31
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$91,400
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fashion Designers page for New York →

Fashion Designers

Virginia

Median salary
$94,120
Mean salary
$87,480
Employment
100
Location quotient
0.17
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$93,092
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fashion Designers page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into fashion designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.