Skip to content
uswages .org

Fast Food And Counter Workers Salary: Alabama vs Vermont

Fast Food And Counter Workers earn a median of $23,700 in Alabama and $36,030 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $12,330 (-34.2%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$23,700
Alabama median
$26,682 after COL
$36,030
Vermont median
$36,781 after COL
-34.2%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-27.5%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $12,330 more per year than Alabama for fast food and counter workers, a gap of +34.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,099 of extra purchasing power (+27.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fast food and counter workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fast Food And Counter Workers

Alabama

Median salary
$23,700
Mean salary
$25,600
Employment
41,460
Location quotient
0.79
Jobs per 1,000
19.6
COL-adjusted median
$26,682
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fast Food And Counter Workers page for Alabama →

Fast Food And Counter Workers

Vermont

Median salary
$36,030
Mean salary
$37,610
Employment
6,830
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
22.5
COL-adjusted median
$36,781
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fast Food And Counter Workers page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into fast food and counter workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.