Skip to content
uswages .org

Fast Food And Counter Workers Salary: Maine vs Colorado

Fast Food And Counter Workers earn a median of $34,710 in Maine and $36,270 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $1,560 (-4.3%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$34,710
Maine median
$35,765 after COL
$36,270
Colorado median
$35,196 after COL
-4.3%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
+1.6%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $1,560 more per year than Maine for fast food and counter workers, a gap of +4.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Maine actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $569 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fast food and counter workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fast Food And Counter Workers

Maine

Median salary
$34,710
Mean salary
$35,880
Employment
17,250
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
26.9
COL-adjusted median
$35,765
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fast Food And Counter Workers page for Maine →

Fast Food And Counter Workers

Colorado

Median salary
$36,270
Mean salary
$36,890
Employment
82,010
Location quotient
1.15
Jobs per 1,000
28.5
COL-adjusted median
$35,196
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fast Food And Counter Workers page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into fast food and counter workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.