Skip to content
uswages .org

Fast Food And Counter Workers Salary: North Dakota vs Massachusetts

Fast Food And Counter Workers earn a median of $30,080 in North Dakota and $35,850 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $5,770 (-16.1%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$30,080
North Dakota median
$33,813 after COL
$35,850
Massachusetts median
$33,898 after COL
-16.1%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-0.3%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $5,770 more per year than North Dakota for fast food and counter workers, a gap of +16.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $85 of extra purchasing power (+0.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fast food and counter workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fast Food And Counter Workers

North Dakota

Median salary
$30,080
Mean salary
$31,260
Employment
11,470
Location quotient
1.08
Jobs per 1,000
26.7
COL-adjusted median
$33,813
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fast Food And Counter Workers page for North Dakota →

Fast Food And Counter Workers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$35,850
Mean salary
$35,880
Employment
85,810
Location quotient
0.95
Jobs per 1,000
23.6
COL-adjusted median
$33,898
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fast Food And Counter Workers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into fast food and counter workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.