Skip to content
uswages .org

Fence Erectors Salary: California vs Alaska

Fence Erectors earn a median of $56,060 in California and $64,600 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $8,540 (-13.2%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$56,060
California median
$50,632 after COL
$64,600
Alaska median
$63,111 after COL
-13.2%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-19.8%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $8,540 more per year than California for fence erectors, a gap of +13.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,479 of extra purchasing power (+19.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fence erectors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fence Erectors

California

Median salary
$56,060
Mean salary
$58,390
Employment
3,150
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$50,632
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fence Erectors page for California →

Fence Erectors

Alaska

Median salary
$64,600
Mean salary
$64,000
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$63,111
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fence Erectors page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into fence erectors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.