Skip to content
uswages .org

Fence Erectors Salary: New Jersey vs Connecticut

Fence Erectors earn a median of $56,690 in New Jersey and $53,180 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $3,510 (+6.6%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$56,690
New Jersey median
$52,102 after COL
$53,180
Connecticut median
$51,327 after COL
+6.6%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
+1.5%
Adjusted gap
New Jersey leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $3,510 more per year than Connecticut for fence erectors, a gap of +6.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Jersey still comes out ahead, with roughly $775 of extra purchasing power (+1.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fence erectors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fence Erectors

New Jersey

Median salary
$56,690
Mean salary
$56,410
Employment
910
Location quotient
1.35
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$52,102
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fence Erectors page for New Jersey →

Fence Erectors

Connecticut

Median salary
$53,180
Mean salary
$54,970
Employment
300
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$51,327
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fence Erectors page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into fence erectors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.