Skip to content
uswages .org

Film And Video Editors Salary: Virginia vs California

Film And Video Editors earn a median of $78,740 in Virginia and $88,490 in California. That is a nominal gap of $9,750 (-11.0%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$78,740
Virginia median
$77,880 after COL
$88,490
California median
$79,922 after COL
-11.0%
Nominal gap
California leads
-2.6%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $9,750 more per year than Virginia for film and video editors, a gap of +11.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,042 of extra purchasing power (+2.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for film and video editors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Film And Video Editors

Virginia

Median salary
$78,740
Mean salary
$80,660
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$77,880
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Film And Video Editors page for Virginia →

Film And Video Editors

California

Median salary
$88,490
Mean salary
$99,450
Employment
8,110
Location quotient
2.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$79,922
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Film And Video Editors page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into film and video editors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.