Skip to content
uswages .org

Financial And Investment Analysts Salary: Wyoming vs New York

Financial And Investment Analysts earn a median of $187,090 in Wyoming and $127,930 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $59,160 (+46.2%), with Wyoming paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$187,090
Wyoming median
$201,843 after COL
$127,930
New York median
$118,540 after COL
+46.2%
Nominal gap
Wyoming leads
+70.3%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wyoming pays $59,160 more per year than New York for financial and investment analysts, a gap of +46.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wyoming still comes out ahead, with roughly $83,302 of extra purchasing power (+70.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for financial and investment analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Financial And Investment Analysts

Wyoming

Median salary
$187,090
Mean salary
$195,710
Employment
190
Location quotient
0.29
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$201,843
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial And Investment Analysts page for Wyoming →

Financial And Investment Analysts

New York

Median salary
$127,930
Mean salary
$146,620
Employment
52,380
Location quotient
2.32
Jobs per 1,000
5.4
COL-adjusted median
$118,540
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial And Investment Analysts page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into financial and investment analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.