Skip to content
uswages .org

Financial Examiners Salary: California vs Connecticut

Financial Examiners earn a median of $106,000 in California and $120,530 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $14,530 (-12.1%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$106,000
California median
$95,737 after COL
$120,530
Connecticut median
$116,330 after COL
-12.1%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-17.7%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $14,530 more per year than California for financial examiners, a gap of +12.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,593 of extra purchasing power (+17.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for financial examiners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Financial Examiners

California

Median salary
$106,000
Mean salary
$118,710
Employment
4,200
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$95,737
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for California →

Financial Examiners

Connecticut

Median salary
$120,530
Mean salary
$126,220
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$116,330
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into financial examiners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.