Skip to content
uswages .org

Financial Examiners Salary: District of Columbia vs Massachusetts

Financial Examiners earn a median of $198,720 in District of Columbia and $111,110 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $87,610 (+78.8%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$198,720
District of Columbia median
$180,817 after COL
$111,110
Massachusetts median
$105,062 after COL
+78.8%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
+72.1%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $87,610 more per year than Massachusetts for financial examiners, a gap of +78.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $75,756 of extra purchasing power (+72.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for financial examiners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Financial Examiners

District of Columbia

Median salary
$198,720
Mean salary
$187,240
Employment
470
Location quotient
1.52
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$180,817
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for District of Columbia →

Financial Examiners

Massachusetts

Median salary
$111,110
Mean salary
$121,700
Employment
950
Location quotient
0.60
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$105,062
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into financial examiners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.