Skip to content
uswages .org

Financial Examiners Salary: Massachusetts vs California

Financial Examiners earn a median of $111,110 in Massachusetts and $106,000 in California. That is a nominal gap of $5,110 (+4.8%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$111,110
Massachusetts median
$105,062 after COL
$106,000
California median
$95,737 after COL
+4.8%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+9.7%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $5,110 more per year than California for financial examiners, a gap of +4.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,325 of extra purchasing power (+9.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for financial examiners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Financial Examiners

Massachusetts

Median salary
$111,110
Mean salary
$121,700
Employment
950
Location quotient
0.60
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$105,062
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for Massachusetts →

Financial Examiners

California

Median salary
$106,000
Mean salary
$118,710
Employment
4,200
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$95,737
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into financial examiners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.