Skip to content
uswages .org

Financial Managers Salary: Colorado vs Virginia

Financial Managers earn a median of $182,690 in Colorado and $185,220 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $2,530 (-1.4%), with Virginia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$182,690
Colorado median
$177,279 after COL
$185,220
Virginia median
$183,197 after COL
-1.4%
Nominal gap
Virginia leads
-3.2%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Virginia pays $2,530 more per year than Colorado for financial managers, a gap of +1.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Virginia still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,918 of extra purchasing power (+3.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for financial managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Financial Managers

Colorado

Median salary
$182,690
Mean salary
$209,360
Employment
10,640
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
3.7
COL-adjusted median
$177,279
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Managers page for Colorado →

Financial Managers

Virginia

Median salary
$185,220
Mean salary
$199,320
Employment
20,850
Location quotient
0.94
Jobs per 1,000
5.1
COL-adjusted median
$183,197
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Managers page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into financial managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.