Skip to content
uswages .org

Financial Risk Specialists Salary: North Carolina vs Maine

Financial Risk Specialists earn a median of $132,040 in North Carolina and $141,020 in Maine. That is a nominal gap of $8,980 (-6.4%), with Maine paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$132,040
North Carolina median
$139,983 after COL
$141,020
Maine median
$145,307 after COL
-6.4%
Nominal gap
Maine leads
-3.7%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maine pays $8,980 more per year than North Carolina for financial risk specialists, a gap of +6.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maine still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,324 of extra purchasing power (+3.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for financial risk specialists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Financial Risk Specialists

North Carolina

Median salary
$132,040
Mean salary
$133,190
Employment
3,200
Location quotient
1.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$139,983
Regional Price Parity
94.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Risk Specialists page for North Carolina →

Financial Risk Specialists

Maine

Median salary
$141,020
Mean salary
$121,090
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$145,307
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Risk Specialists page for Maine →

Related pages

Keep digging into financial risk specialists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.