Skip to content
uswages .org

Fire Inspectors And Investigators Salary: Nevada vs California

Fire Inspectors And Investigators earn a median of $93,450 in Nevada and $99,230 in California. That is a nominal gap of $5,780 (-5.8%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$93,450
Nevada median
$93,470 after COL
$99,230
California median
$89,622 after COL
-5.8%
Nominal gap
California leads
+4.3%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $5,780 more per year than Nevada for fire inspectors and investigators, a gap of +5.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nevada actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,847 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fire inspectors and investigators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fire Inspectors And Investigators

Nevada

Median salary
$93,450
Mean salary
$91,600
Employment
190
Location quotient
1.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$93,470
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fire Inspectors And Investigators page for Nevada →

Fire Inspectors And Investigators

California

Median salary
$99,230
Mean salary
$102,500
Employment
1,350
Location quotient
0.83
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$89,622
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fire Inspectors And Investigators page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into fire inspectors and investigators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.