Skip to content
uswages .org

Fish And Game Wardens Salary: California vs Maryland

Fish And Game Wardens earn a median of $100,090 in California and $89,300 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $10,790 (+12.1%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$100,090
California median
$90,399 after COL
$89,300
Maryland median
$85,081 after COL
+12.1%
Nominal gap
California leads
+6.3%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $10,790 more per year than Maryland for fish and game wardens, a gap of +12.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,318 of extra purchasing power (+6.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fish and game wardens in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fish And Game Wardens

California

Median salary
$100,090
Mean salary
$96,130
Employment
330
Location quotient
0.49
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$90,399
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fish And Game Wardens page for California →

Fish And Game Wardens

Maryland

Median salary
$89,300
Mean salary
$91,150
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$85,081
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fish And Game Wardens page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into fish and game wardens from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.