Skip to content
uswages .org

Fish And Game Wardens Salary: Nevada vs Iowa

Fish And Game Wardens earn a median of $91,750 in Nevada and $98,260 in Iowa. That is a nominal gap of $6,510 (-6.6%), with Iowa paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$91,750
Nevada median
$91,769 after COL
$98,260
Iowa median
$111,962 after COL
-6.6%
Nominal gap
Iowa leads
-18.0%
Adjusted gap
Iowa leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Iowa pays $6,510 more per year than Nevada for fish and game wardens, a gap of +6.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Iowa still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,193 of extra purchasing power (+18.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fish and game wardens in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fish And Game Wardens

Nevada

Median salary
$91,750
Mean salary
$90,270
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.85
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$91,769
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fish And Game Wardens page for Nevada →

Fish And Game Wardens

Iowa

Median salary
$98,260
Mean salary
$89,620
Employment
120
Location quotient
2.12
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$111,962
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fish And Game Wardens page for Iowa →

Related pages

Keep digging into fish and game wardens from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.