Skip to content
uswages .org

Flight Attendants Salary: Georgia vs Washington

Flight Attendants earn a median of $78,320 in Georgia and $74,090 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $4,230 (+5.7%), with Georgia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$78,320
Georgia median
$81,335 after COL
$74,090
Washington median
$69,235 after COL
+5.7%
Nominal gap
Georgia leads
+17.5%
Adjusted gap
Georgia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Georgia pays $4,230 more per year than Washington for flight attendants, a gap of +5.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Georgia still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,101 of extra purchasing power (+17.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for flight attendants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Flight Attendants

Georgia

Median salary
$78,320
Mean salary
$83,930
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$81,335
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Flight Attendants page for Georgia →

Flight Attendants

Washington

Median salary
$74,090
Mean salary
$83,660
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$69,235
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Flight Attendants page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into flight attendants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.