Skip to content
uswages .org

Floor Sanders And Finishers Salary: Kentucky vs Utah

Floor Sanders And Finishers earn a median of $54,580 in Kentucky and $74,240 in Utah. That is a nominal gap of $19,660 (-26.5%), with Utah paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,580
Kentucky median
$60,537 after COL
$74,240
Utah median
$75,093 after COL
-26.5%
Nominal gap
Utah leads
-19.4%
Adjusted gap
Utah leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Utah pays $19,660 more per year than Kentucky for floor sanders and finishers, a gap of +26.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Utah still comes out ahead, with roughly $14,556 of extra purchasing power (+19.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for floor sanders and finishers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Floor Sanders And Finishers

Kentucky

Median salary
$54,580
Mean salary
$58,710
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$60,537
Regional Price Parity
90.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Floor Sanders And Finishers page for Kentucky →

Floor Sanders And Finishers

Utah

Median salary
$74,240
Mean salary
$72,820
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.84
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$75,093
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Floor Sanders And Finishers page for Utah →

Related pages

Keep digging into floor sanders and finishers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.