Skip to content
uswages .org

Food Science Technicians Salary: Washington vs Nevada

Food Science Technicians earn a median of $62,070 in Washington and $59,070 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $3,000 (+5.1%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$62,070
Washington median
$58,002 after COL
$59,070
Nevada median
$59,082 after COL
+5.1%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-1.8%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $3,000 more per year than Nevada for food science technicians, a gap of +5.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nevada actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,080 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for food science technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Food Science Technicians

Washington

Median salary
$62,070
Mean salary
$65,120
Employment
660
Location quotient
1.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$58,002
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Science Technicians page for Washington →

Food Science Technicians

Nevada

Median salary
$59,070
Mean salary
$58,820
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$59,082
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Science Technicians page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into food science technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.