Skip to content
uswages .org

Food Science Technicians Salary: Washington vs Virginia

Food Science Technicians earn a median of $62,070 in Washington and $65,360 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $3,290 (-5.0%), with Virginia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$62,070
Washington median
$58,002 after COL
$65,360
Virginia median
$64,646 after COL
-5.0%
Nominal gap
Virginia leads
-10.3%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Virginia pays $3,290 more per year than Washington for food science technicians, a gap of +5.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Virginia still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,644 of extra purchasing power (+10.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for food science technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Food Science Technicians

Washington

Median salary
$62,070
Mean salary
$65,120
Employment
660
Location quotient
1.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$58,002
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Science Technicians page for Washington →

Food Science Technicians

Virginia

Median salary
$65,360
Mean salary
$65,500
Employment
150
Location quotient
0.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$64,646
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Science Technicians page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into food science technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.