Skip to content
uswages .org

Food Service Managers Salary: New York vs Massachusetts

Food Service Managers earn a median of $84,200 in New York and $92,240 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $8,040 (-8.7%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$84,200
New York median
$78,020 after COL
$92,240
Massachusetts median
$87,219 after COL
-8.7%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-10.5%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $8,040 more per year than New York for food service managers, a gap of +8.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,199 of extra purchasing power (+10.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for food service managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Food Service Managers

New York

Median salary
$84,200
Mean salary
$94,250
Employment
8,000
Location quotient
0.54
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$78,020
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Service Managers page for New York →

Food Service Managers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$92,240
Mean salary
$91,810
Employment
4,310
Location quotient
0.77
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$87,219
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Service Managers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into food service managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.