Skip to content
uswages .org

Food Service Managers Salary: Rhode Island vs Alaska

Food Service Managers earn a median of $82,850 in Rhode Island and $82,030 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $820 (+1.0%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$82,850
Rhode Island median
$81,003 after COL
$82,030
Alaska median
$80,140 after COL
+1.0%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
+1.1%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $820 more per year than Alaska for food service managers, a gap of +1.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $864 of extra purchasing power (+1.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for food service managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Food Service Managers

Rhode Island

Median salary
$82,850
Mean salary
$84,340
Employment
760
Location quotient
0.99
Jobs per 1,000
1.5
COL-adjusted median
$81,003
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Service Managers page for Rhode Island →

Food Service Managers

Alaska

Median salary
$82,030
Mean salary
$86,640
Employment
380
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$80,140
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Service Managers page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into food service managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.