Skip to content
uswages .org

Forest And Conservation Technicians Salary: Louisiana vs Minnesota

Forest And Conservation Technicians earn a median of $59,370 in Louisiana and $58,990 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $380 (+0.6%), with Louisiana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$59,370
Louisiana median
$67,308 after COL
$58,990
Minnesota median
$59,815 after COL
+0.6%
Nominal gap
Louisiana leads
+12.5%
Adjusted gap
Louisiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Louisiana pays $380 more per year than Minnesota for forest and conservation technicians, a gap of +0.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Louisiana still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,493 of extra purchasing power (+12.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for forest and conservation technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Forest And Conservation Technicians

Louisiana

Median salary
$59,370
Mean salary
$62,920
Employment
210
Location quotient
0.57
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$67,308
Regional Price Parity
88.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Forest And Conservation Technicians page for Louisiana →

Forest And Conservation Technicians

Minnesota

Median salary
$58,990
Mean salary
$61,040
Employment
580
Location quotient
1.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$59,815
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Forest And Conservation Technicians page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into forest and conservation technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.